If you’re building a Next.js 15 application with TypeScript, you might have stumbled upon the error: “Type ‘{ params: { id: string; }; }’ does not satisfy the constraint ‘PageProps’”. This TypeScript error can be confusing, especially when working with dynamic routes or App Router in Next.js. Don’t worry—this guide will break down what this error means, why it occurs, and how to fix it in simple, beginner-friendly language.
What Is the “Type { params: { id: string; }; } Does Not Satisfy PageProps” Error?
This error occurs in Next.js 15 when TypeScript detects a mismatch between the expected props for a page component and the props you’re providing. Specifically, it’s related to the PageProps
type (or similar constraints) used in the App Router for dynamic routes. The error message typically looks like this:
Type '{ params: { id: string; }; }' does not satisfy the constraint 'PageProps'.
Types of property 'params' are incompatible.
Type '{ id: string; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string | string[]>'.
Property 'id' is incompatible with index signature.
Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'string | string[]'.
What does this mean?
- PageProps: In Next.js 15’s App Router,
PageProps
is a TypeScript interface that defines the props a page component receives, includingparams
(for dynamic route parameters) andsearchParams
(for query strings). - The Issue: The error indicates that the
params
object (e.g.,{ id: string }
) doesn’t match the expected type forPageProps
, which requiresparams
to be aRecord<string, string | string[]>
. This meansparams
values can be either a single string or an array of strings (to support catch-all or optional catch-all routes). - Common Context: This error often appears in dynamic routes (e.g.,
/pages/[id].tsx
) or when defining props for a page component incorrectly.
Question: Can you think of a situation in your Next.js project where you defined a dynamic route? For example, did you create a file like [id].tsx
or use params
in your component?
Why Does This Error Happen in Next.js 15?
To fix this error, let’s explore its common causes:
- Incorrect Type Definition: You defined the
params
prop as{ id: string }
, but Next.js expectsparams
to supportstring | string[]
for dynamic routes (e.g., catch-all routes like[...slug]
). - Dynamic Routes Misconfiguration: Using dynamic routes (e.g.,
[id].tsx
) without properly typing the page component’s props. - Outdated TypeScript Types: Using types from an older Next.js version that don’t align with Next.js 15’s App Router.
- Missing or Incorrect Props: The page component doesn’t explicitly define
PageProps
or its equivalent, causing TypeScript to infer an incompatible type. - Middleware or Route Handlers: Incorrectly handling
params
in middleware or API routes, leading to type mismatches. - Third-Party Libraries: Libraries or templates (e.g., Next.js starters) may use outdated TypeScript configurations.
Question: Which of these causes might apply to your project? For instance, are you using dynamic routes, and how are you typing your page components?
Real-World Scenarios
Here are common scenarios where this error appears:
- Dynamic Route Page: A file like
app/[id]/page.tsx
with a component expectingparams: { id: string }
but not accounting forstring | string[]
. - Catch-All Routes: Using
[...slug]
or[[...slug]]
routes, which requireparams
values to be arrays. - Custom Props: Combining
params
with custom props in a page component without proper typing. - TypeScript Strict Mode: Enabling strict mode in
tsconfig.json
, which enforces stricter type checks.
How to Debug the Next.js Type Error PageProps
Debugging this error involves identifying where the type mismatch occurs and ensuring your code aligns with Next.js 15’s expectations. Let’s explore the steps.
Step 1: Check Your Route Structure
Confirm you’re using the App Router (Next.js 13+) and that your dynamic route is set up correctly:
- File Structure: For a dynamic route like
/post/123
, your file should beapp/post/[id]/page.tsx
. - Catch-All Routes: For routes like
/post/123/456
, useapp/post/[...slug]/page.tsx
.
Question: What’s the difference between a dynamic route like [id]
and a catch-all route like [...slug]
? How might this affect the params
type?
Step 2: Inspect Your Page Component
Look at the page component (e.g., app/[id]/page.tsx
). A typical component might look like this:
export default function Page({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {
return <div>Post ID: {params.id}</div>;
}
The error occurs because { id: string }
doesn’t satisfy Record<string, string | string[]>
. Next.js expects params
to handle both single strings (for [id]
) and arrays (for [...slug]
).
Step 3: Use TypeScript Debugging Tools
- VS Code: Hover over the
params
prop to see TypeScript’s inferred type and the expectedPageProps
type. - TS Error Output: Check the full error in your terminal or editor to identify the exact file and line.
- Next.js Types: Import types from
next
to ensure you’re using the latest definitions:import { NextPage } from 'next';
Question: How can tools like VS Code’s TypeScript support help you spot type errors early?
How to Fix the Type Error in Next.js 15
Let’s explore practical solutions to resolve this Next.js Type Error PageProps, starting with the most common fixes.
Fix 1: Use Correct PageProps Type
Next.js provides built-in types for App Router pages. Update your page component to use NextPage
or explicit PageProps
:
import { NextPage } from 'next';
interface PageProps {
params: { id: string };
searchParams: { [key: string]: string | string[] | undefined };
}
const Page: NextPage<PageProps> = ({ params }) => {
return <div>Post ID: {params.id}</div>;
};
export default Page;
This ensures params
and searchParams
match Next.js 15’s expectations.
Question: Why does Next.js require searchParams
in the PageProps
interface, even if you’re not using query strings?
Fix 2: Handle Catch-All Routes
If you’re using catch-all routes ([...slug]
or [[...slug]]
), params.slug
must be typed as string[]
:
import { NextPage } from 'next';
interface PageProps {
params: { slug: string[] };
searchParams: { [key: string]: string | string[] | undefined };
}
const Page: NextPage<PageProps> = ({ params }) => {
return <div>Slug: {params.slug.join('/')}</div>;
};
export default Page;
For optional catch-all routes ([[...slug]]
), params.slug
can be string[] | undefined
.
Question: How does a catch-all route differ from a single dynamic route in terms of the params
object?
Fix 3: Use DynamicParams Type for Flexibility
If your route might handle both single parameters and arrays, use a more flexible type:
import { NextPage } from 'next';
interface PageProps {
params: Record<string, string | string[]>;
searchParams: { [key: string]: string | string[] | undefined };
}
const Page: NextPage<PageProps> = ({ params }) => {
const id = Array.isArray(params.id) ? params.id[0] : params.id;
return <div>Post ID: {id}</div>;
};
export default Page;
This satisfies the Record<string, string | string[]>
constraint.
Fix 4: Update Next.js and TypeScript
Ensure you’re using the latest Next.js and TypeScript versions:
- Check Versions:
npm list next typescript
- Update:
npm install next@latest typescript@latest @types/node@latest
- Check tsconfig.json:
Ensure it includes:{ "compilerOptions": { "target": "es5", "lib": ["dom", "dom.iterable", "esnext"], "module": "esnext", "moduleResolution": "node", "jsx": "preserve", "strict": true } }
Question: Why might outdated dependencies cause TypeScript errors in Next.js?
Fix 5: Handle Middleware or Route Handlers
If the error occurs in middleware or API routes, ensure you’re typing the params
correctly:
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server';
export async function GET(
request: NextRequest,
{ params }: { params: { id: string } }
) {
return NextResponse.json({ id: params.id });
}
For middleware:
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server';
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const params = request.nextUrl.pathname.split('/').filter(Boolean);
return NextResponse.next();
}
Question: How do middleware and route handlers differ from page components in handling params
?
Best Practices for TypeScript in Next.js 15
To prevent this and other TypeScript errors:
- Use Next.js Types: Always import types like
NextPage
,GetServerSideProps
, orGetStaticProps
fromnext
. - Enable Strict Mode: Set
"strict": true
intsconfig.json
to catch errors early. - Type Dynamic Routes Correctly: Use
Record<string, string | string[]>
forparams
in dynamic routes. - Keep Dependencies Updated: Regularly update Next.js, TypeScript, and related packages.
- Use ESLint: Enable the
@typescript-eslint
plugin to catch type issues. - Test Routes: Test dynamic routes in development to ensure props are handled correctly.
Question: Which of these practices could you adopt to improve your Next.js TypeScript workflow?
Tools for TypeScript and Next.js
Tool | Purpose | Cost |
---|---|---|
ESLint | Catch TypeScript errors | Free |
VS Code | TypeScript IntelliSense | Free |
TypeScript Playground | Test TypeScript snippets | Free |
Vercel | Deploy and debug Next.js apps | Free/Paid |
Common Scenarios and Fixes
Scenario | Fix |
---|---|
Dynamic route [id] | Use params: { id: string } with PageProps |
Catch-all route [...slug] | Type params: { slug: string[] } |
Outdated Next.js version | Update to Next.js 15 |
Incorrect middleware typing | Use NextRequest and correct params |
FAQs About Next.js Type Error PageProps
Why does this error only appear with TypeScript?
TypeScript enforces strict type checking, catching mismatches that JavaScript would ignore.
Can I ignore this error by disabling strict mode?
Disabling strict mode may hide the error but can lead to runtime issues. It’s better to fix the types.
Does this error affect Next.js 14 or earlier?
Yes, but Next.js 15’s updated App Router types are stricter, making this error more common.
How do I know if my route is dynamic or catch-all?
Check your file structure: [id]
is dynamic, [...slug]
is catch-all, and [[...slug]]
is optional catch-all.
Conclusion: Master TypeScript in Next.js 15
The Next.js Type Error “Type { params: { id: string; }; } does not satisfy PageProps” is a common TypeScript hurdle, but it’s fixable with proper typing and an understanding of Next.js 15’s App Router. By using NextPage
, typing params
correctly, and keeping your dependencies updated, you can resolve this error and build robust applications in 2025.
Ready to fix this error? Update your page component with the correct PageProps
type and test your dynamic routes. Have you encountered this error before? Share your experience in the comments below!
Resource: For more TypeScript and Next.js tips, visit the Next.js Documentation.